Now tell me that dirtbag fraud Cruz is not an establishment pansy prostitute.
He was just on CNN blaming Trump for the chaos in Chicago right alongside the most liberal establishment CNN commentators.
I KNEW he would once again align with establishment Dems and GOP as soon as I heard the news from Chicago.
Cruz stood like a sissy in the debate and said Iran was an enemy preparing Nuke Deal proceeds to kill our soldiers and allies yet that COWARD REFUSED TO CALL THE DEAL TREASON! Constitutionalst fraud of the pinkest kind.
Cruz is saying the same things Van Jones is saying on CNN and giving Obama the same pass on treason.
Van Jones is praising Cruz as I write this. Birds of a feather.
Last Saturday on air with Rudi K on his radio show, Mainstreet Out Loud I warned this violent protest was coming. Who else did? I said the organized pro-Obama groups would use youth, race and economics to promote a contentious summer worse than ’68.
I should have added that Cruz would align with Dems in it. I said he is pure establishment and maybe tonight his low-information Rush/Beck/Levin fans will start puking koolaid and realize it. Or they can back Team Cruz-Van Jones on CNN.
Want more truth before it happens? Listen to Rudi & I on air Saturday. KKNT 960 AM Phoenix, Mainstreet Out Loud.
I’m noticing a disturbing trend here: Trump rallies are becoming violent. We are seeing Trump supporters and his security personnel attacking reporters, photographers, and non-violent protesters. Three were attacked in Ky, 1 in NC, the Time photographer in Vegas, and the Breitbart reporter.
Now we have 5 arrested in Chicago and 30 arrested in St. Louis.
These are just a few of many examples, and you can read the stories here:
http://www.cnn.com/…/donald-trump-chicago-prote…/index.html…
http://www.nydailynews.com/…/donald-trump-rally-st-louis-fe…
And Donald Trump is inciting this violence by promising to pay the legal fees of people who violently attack protesters at his rallies
http://www.theblaze.com/…/trump-tells-crowd-hell-pay-lega…/…
As Americans, we have a Constitutional right to peacefully assemble and protest our government, (and candidates for government.) Civil dissent is an essential liberty.
Our candidates and their supporters also have the right to peacefully gather, speak and make their ideas and platforms heard without fear of violent censure or retaliation by government or their fellow citizens
Violence, inciting violence, vandalism, assault and battery etc. have NEVER been a right, or protected speech
Neither Donald Trump, his supporters, nor his protesters have the right to engage in violent behavior. And there is plenty of blame and responsibility to be shared among all three.
This isn’t American. This isn’t who we are.
Trump protestors and Trump supporters encouraging and committing violence should be ashamed of themselves: They are NOT protesters or patriots, and they are NOT making a statement.
They are small minded, hate driven assholes. They are a disgrace to the political process and serious threat to their fellow citizens, and they need to grow up and wise up.
–
Wow. You are a complete GOP establishment nutcase, huh?
The new lows you people develop in spin as you ignore our constitutional rights sometines surprises even me, and I already knew you were frauds!
You made reference to Donald Trump’s protesters, where are these protesters you speak of? The ones that protested in Chicago are paid by the democrat thugs. They were paid by Bernie Sanders, moveon.org, blm, and Debbie Wasserman Schultz to restrict Mr. Trump’s right to free speech and conduct a peaceful gathering. Are you also referring to Mr. Trump’s supporters as “small minded,hate driven assholes”? Inquiring minds want to know.
So if one has his records sealed they can run for president, WHAT???
Facts about our Constitution every voter must know before saying they honor our Founding principles and Constitution. Before backing a candidate you need to know exactly which parts of our Constitution they are choosing to ignore as they fool those they hope to win over:
Article 6 states that all U.S. Senators must swear by oath or affirmation to support our Constitution.
Article 3, Section 3 says that treason consists of adhering to our enemies or giving them aid and comfort.
Article 2, Section 4 says the President AND ALL CIVIL OFFICERS shall be removed for treason.
Therefore; to support our Constitution Senators must fight to remove a President who commits treason.
The Iran deal which not only gives them nukes plus $150,000,000,000 of our dollars is treason—aid and comfort to an enemy.
The trade and release of enemy Generals for Bergdahl is adherence and aid to an enemy.
Every U.S. Senator who fails to say these truths is in violation of Article 6 and their sworn oath of office, an offense they should be removed for.
Rubio and Cruz are running for the Presidency while both are clearly in violation and should be subject to removal themselves.
This is our Constitution, not a political opinion and it clearly shows how far we are from knowing or caring about our Constitution when blatant violations are ignored yet gullible followers still support promoting those who defy their own oaths of office.
Anyone backing either Senator running within the GOP is directly in support of Constitutional violations. And the sad part is most of them don’t even know it and when told they won’t care. Now tell me why we can’t seem to elect honest leaders.
We have frauds complaining Obama won’t utter the words, “radical Islamic extremists” while they refuse to honor their oath and utter the words guilty of treason and must be removed. Worse than mere frauds, Rubio and Cruz are charlatans and cowards. Why else would they blatantly ignore tough fights demanded by our Constitution? This is why we have a Senate as a co-equal branch, to control the Executive who may violate law. and they are asleep on the job.ruz giving Obama a free pass on flagrant treason:
looks like Cruz is resorting to the Alinsky/Democrat playbook of never let a crisis go to waste and fanning the fires of hatred – Is it the panic setting in or does he really think this is the way to win votes ? Van Jones is NOT a good example to model your rhetoric after Ted – Get it ???